Arbitration Clause Applies to Post-Employment Defamation

The alleged conduct of a prior employer after termination of the employee must be arbitrated pursuant to an arbitration agreement, according to the Fort Worth Court of Appeals. In Ensign Group, Inc., et al. v. Mammen, Cause No. 02-14-00317-CV (Tex. App.—Fort Worth May 14, 2015), Defendant terminated Plaintiff’s employment. When a prospective employer contacted Defendant for a reference for Plaintiff, Defendant allegedly stated that Plaintiff was “lazy” and was escorted out of the building by police. The prospective employer allegedly told Plaintiff that it would not offer her a position based on Defendant’s poor reference. Plaintiff sued Defendant for negligence, slander and tortious interference with prospective contract. Defendant moved to compel arbitration of Plaintiff’s claims on the basis of an arbitration agreement the parties entered into while Plaintiff was still an employee of Defendant. The agreement called for all claims, “whether or not” the claims arose out of Plaintiff’s “employment, remuneration or termination,” to be arbitrated under the Federal Arbitration Act. The agreement also stated that it would survive termination of the

Arbitrator Fails to Fully Disclose Potential Conflicts

In determining that an arbitrator may be deposed after issuing his award, the Dallas Court of Appeals examined the standards for allowing post-award discovery to examine “evident partiality.” It also examined the evidentiary value of unsworn statements made by attorneys in court. In Fatima Rodas v. La Madeleine of Texas, Inc., Cause No. 05-14-00054-CV, an employee of La Madeleine, Rodas, sued La Madeleine for injuries she sustained on the job. La Madeleine compelled arbitration of the dispute. The arbitrator issued a take nothing award against Rodas. After the award was issued, Rodas filed a motion to vacate, arguing the arbitrator failed to disclose another arbitration he was presiding over and in which La Madeleine’s counsel was representing one of the parties. Rodas sought to depose the arbitrator about the undisclosed contact, but La Madeleine and the arbitrator opposed the discovery. During hearings on whether Rodas could depose the arbitrator, the arbitrator’s attorney disclosed that La Madeleine’s attorneys had two other arbitrations, not just one, with the arbitrator and provided inconsistent information about the